Saturday, August 21, 2010

I have a question for those of you who support civil unions but not gay marriage?

1. Why do you think ';separate but equal'; is ok?


Didn't we already declare that unconstitutional in 1964?








(and don't give me that ';separate restrooms'; argument; that's covered by the right to privacy)











2. If two domestic partners separate..........are they allowed to use the word, ';divorce?';


or should we call that something else too?














3. Should straight couples be allowed to engage in ';civil unions'; ?I have a question for those of you who support civil unions but not gay marriage?
Marriage is a legal status. Gays should be as free to abuse it as heterosexuals. Tax breaks for marriages should be eliminated.





Married people get all sorts of protections and tax breaks the rest of us pay for them.I have a question for those of you who support civil unions but not gay marriage?
';1. Why do you think ';separate but equal'; is ok?


Didn't we already declare that unconstitutional in 1964?'; Because in this case it is, legal marriage is different from religious marriage, forcing the churches to preform gay marriages is a violation of freedom of religion.


';2. If two domestic partners separate..........are they allowed to use the word, ';divorce?';


or should we call that something else too?';


Like I care.


';3. Should straight couples be allowed to engage in ';civil unions'; ?'; Yep, and they already do, atheists get civil unions and don't ***** about not being able to force a group to do something against it's own beliefs.


';you really dont get it do you marriage is defined by a joining of a man and a woman daaaaaaa.i know you will hate this but look up the phrase a nation under one god.'; I know you won't believe this but we aren't a Christian nation, that was added in 1951 I believe, not since the founding of the nation, regardless marriage religiously should be up to the churches.
1. marriage and gay unions are not the same.





2. dont care.





3. or bestiality practicers? how about polygamist?





To the nutjob above, legal protection is a different arguement and you and your fellow rumprangers would get more support if you stuck to that, instead of trying to pervert their stuff.
The state shouldnt be in the marriage business, period.





Everyone should get civil unions from the state and get married by their Pastor, Rabbi, Imam, Wiccan goddess, etc if they wish.





Marriage is a religious institution and the state should not be collecting and giving licenses for it.
you really dont get it do you marriage is defined by a joining of a man and a woman daaaaaaa.i know you will hate this but look up the phrase a nation under one god.
Prohibition of persons of the same sex is discriminatory and unconstitutional.If some prefer Civil Unions then these ought to be permitted also
Gay marriage is a stalking horse for gays to feel better about themselves because no matter what you call it desiring another man's anus is just wrong on so many levels.
Gays shouldn't be allowed to marry. 2 vagina's don't go together and 2 penises don't go together. Plus that whole man to man butt sex is just plain nasty and unnatural.





Today they want gay marriage, tomorrow they will want the right to marry their pets.

No comments:

Post a Comment